Materials Chemistry Horizons uses a single-blind peer review process. Manuscripts submitted to Materials Chemistry Horizons undergo rigorous evaluation by independent experts in the relevant field. Our reviewers assess the originality, scientific validity, methodology, and significance of the research presented in the manuscripts.

Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two reviewers who provide constructive feedback, identify strengths and weaknesses, and offer recommendations to enhance the quality and impact of the research. The editorial team, in collaboration with reviewers, makes informed decisions regarding the suitability of manuscripts for publication. Reviewers are expected to adhere to their responsibilities as outlined in the COPE Peer Review Guidelines. The following Figure shows the review process.

Authors are provided with an opportunity to track the status of their manuscripts through their accounts on the journal's website. Our editorial office is readily available to assist authors and address any queries or concerns throughout the submission and review process.

Reviewers

Materials Chemistry Horizons extends its sincere appreciation to the esteemed reviewers who contribute their expertise and time to assess the submitted manuscripts. Our reviewers, eminent scholars and researchers in their respective domains, play a pivotal role in ensuring the quality and credibility of the publications in our journal. Their invaluable feedback and insights significantly shape the final outcome of the manuscripts published in Materials Chemistry Horizons.

Authorship

Authors must meet the criteria for authorship as defined by the COPE guidelines on Authorship Criteria and Authors’ Responsibilities. Changes to authorship after submission or during the review process must be communicated to the editorial office and must adhere to COPE's guidelines on Changes of Authorship.

Plagiarism

UniverSci Press journals are committed to publishing articles that offer originality and unique perspectives. Manuscripts submitted for publication undergo thorough scrutiny to ensure they do not contain text plagiarized from previously published works, including the authors' own materials. Submitted manuscripts are subjected to a comprehensive scan and cross-referencing using iThenticate or Turnitin. Should instances of plagiarism be identified, the manuscript may be rejected outright without undergoing the peer-review process.